[Dwarf-Discuss] interpretation of DW_OP_mod
tromey at redhat.com
Tue Jan 19 12:27:42 PST 2010
While looking into a gdb bug I came across an oddity in GCC's unwinder.
It treats the operands of DW_OP_mod as signed:
result = (_Unwind_Sword) second % (_Unwind_Sword) first;
Other programs (valgrind 3.3.1, according to google code search) also
follow this interpretation -- I assume because it seems strange to have
signed division but unsigned modulus.
Is this a (widespread) bug in these programs? Or an oversight in the
More information about the Dwarf-Discuss