[Dwarf-Discuss] question about [0x0..0xffffffff] location list entry
eager at eagercon.com
Thu Jan 20 10:59:52 PST 2011
Roland McGrath wrote:
>> DWARF does not mention overflow in address computations.
>> (Not that there is an address computation here.) Nor does
>> it mention address ranges wrapping.
> There are indeed two address computations here: adding the base address to
> each of the two addresses in the location list entry. I think it would be
> helpful for DWARF to say explicitly that such calculations should not
> overflow/wrap. That is, if the base address plus a list entry address
> exceeds the maximum address representable by the CU's address_size (as in
> this example), the list entry is invalid.
Please submit a comment at http://dwarfstd.org/Comment.php.
Michael Eager eager at eagercon.com
1960 Park Blvd., Palo Alto, CA 94306 650-325-8077
More information about the Dwarf-Discuss