[Dwarf-Discuss] content of DW_AT_name for template
jason at redhat.com
Thu Jun 9 08:21:08 PDT 2011
On 06/09/2011 10:56 AM, Moore, David wrote:
> So if this is to be added as a clarification to Dwarf-4 I think it should be as a "may" (be the simple name) rather than "shall" be the simple name.
That makes sense.
> Do you want a fully qualified name rather than a simple name?
I wouldn't think so. We don't use fully-qualified names for other
entities. But I think it makes sense to drop the word "simple" here.
More information about the Dwarf-Discuss