[Dwarf-Discuss] content of DW_AT_name for template

Jason Merrill jason at redhat.com
Thu Jun 9 08:21:08 PDT 2011


On 06/09/2011 10:56 AM, Moore, David wrote:
> So if this is to be added as a clarification to Dwarf-4 I think it should be as a "may" (be the simple name) rather than "shall" be the simple name.

That makes sense.

> Do you want a fully qualified name rather than a simple name?

I wouldn't think so.  We don't use fully-qualified names for other 
entities.  But I think it makes sense to drop the word "simple" here.

Jason



More information about the Dwarf-Discuss mailing list