mjw at redhat.com
Wed Sep 25 03:38:19 PDT 2013
I saw the following issue which proposed DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_03 and
DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_11. It appears to have been accepted for DWARF4
according to this page:
But apparently didn't make it into the actual DWARF4 spec.
Now I notice DWARF4 came out in 2010, so at least DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_11
would be speculative. Was it misfiled and is this a proposal for DWARF5
Asking because I was wondering if it would make sense to propose
DW_LANG_C11 (ISO/IEC 9899:2011) for DWARF5?
More information about the Dwarf-Discuss