[Dwarf-Discuss] C++14 and C++03 (vs C++98)

Daniel Gutson daniel.gutson at tallertechnologies.com
Wed Nov 26 05:22:23 PST 2014


(Sorry top posting)
What about new C++11 keywords? Would a debugger cli interpreter be helped by this datum in case the user enters some of these keywords? (I can bring the list, only "noexcept" comes from the top of my mind currently)
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat.com>
Sender: "Dwarf-Discuss" <dwarf-discuss-bounces at lists.dwarfstd.org>Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 11:23:21 
To: <dwarf-discuss at lists.dwarfstd.org>
Subject: Re: [Dwarf-Discuss] C++14 and C++03 (vs C++98)

Looks like Tom's reply never made the dwarf mailinglist.
So here it is to make the archive on this issue complete.

On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 09:02 -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Michael> Issue 120628.1 mentions a need to distinguish between C++03 and other
> Michael> versions of C++.  If you believe that DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_03 is not
> Michael> necessary, I suggest that you discuss this with the submitter, Tom
> Michael> Tromey, to understand why he believes that this is required.
> 
> Mark & I discussed it and I couldn't remember any reason that this was
> needed.
> 
> Tom

_______________________________________________
Dwarf-Discuss mailing list
Dwarf-Discuss at lists.dwarfstd.org
http://lists.dwarfstd.org/listinfo.cgi/dwarf-discuss-dwarfstd.org


More information about the Dwarf-Discuss mailing list