[Dwarf-Discuss] Some DWARFv5 draft feedback
todd.allen at ccur.com
Thu Dec 1 04:59:50 PST 2016
> Enumeration types. It is allowed to have a DW_AT_byte_size on a
> DW_TAG_enumeration_type, but not DW_AT_encoding. To describe both size
> and encoding one needs to use a DW_AT_type pointing to a base type that
> represents the "underlying type". For languages where enumerations don't
> have an underlying type, or for strongly typed enums it is easier to
> attach the encoding directly than adding and indirection to a base type.
> Add DW_AT_encoding to the attribute list for DW_TAG_enumeration_type.
FWIW, our Ada compiler always placed DW_AT_encoding attributes directly on
DW_TAG_enumeration_type to indicate the underlying signedness. Ada never was
truly supported, so we just viewed it as part of the Ada support we'd defined.
Concurrent Computer Corporation
More information about the Dwarf-Discuss