[Dwarf-discuss] Encoding fixed-point types
Michael Eager
eager
Thu Jul 14 00:16:09 GMT 2005
Todd Allen wrote:
>>The lack of rational constants, alas, would seem to limit the generality of
>>the supported 'Small values. I observe that such a facility would also give
>>a way to represent Ada named numbers.
>
>
> Well, without them things aren't perfect. But providing smalls as
> double-precision floating-point is pretty good. And likewise with named
> numbers. And it saves debuggers from having to support abitrary-length
> integers. But I certainly wouldn't object to a new DW_TAG_rational_constant
> that provided perfect representations.
>
>
>>Are the vendor extensions for Ada that you mention publicly available?
>
>
> Yes and no. I have permission to distibute Concurrent's, but it isn't
> anywhere that's easy to reach at the moment. I'll send you a copy in a
> subsequent email (to keep the mailing list bandwidth low).
>
> Michael Eager is planning to place DDC-I's spec on the Dwarf 3 website. And
> I'll be sending him a copy of Concurrent's spec to go in the same place.
It's here: http://dwarf.freestandards.org/DDCI_DWARF_Extensions.pdf
--
Michael Eager eager at eagercon.com
1960 Park Blvd., Palo Alto, CA 94306 650-325-8077
More information about the Dwarf-discuss
mailing list