[Dwarf-discuss] Dwarf-discuss Digest, Vol 23, Issue 1
Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana.radhakrishnan
Wed Oct 4 20:25:50 GMT 2006
I thought this was decided by a paragraph some place in the ABI which
dealt with DWARF register numbers so that all vendors would agree on
it.
-Ramana
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 16:21 -0400, Bishop, John E wrote:
> > I understand that DW_OP_breg5 is the value of a register, right? But
> > what is that register? (ebp? I am on Intel x86)
>
> This is one of those things that each compiler gets to
> decide, if I understand correctly. DWARF just says how
> to name a register, the compiler guys decide how to map
> those names to actual registers, and the debugger must
> follow suit.
>
> I believe the Intel mapping is as follows, based on one
> experiment with IDB internals:
>
> Register number 0 is eax
> Register number 1 is ecx
> Register number 2 is edx
> Register number 3 is ebx
> Register number 4 is esp
> Register number 5 is ebp
> Register number 6 is esi
> Register number 7 is edi
> Register number 8 is eip
> Register number 9 is eflags
> Register number 10 is cs
> Register number 11 is ss
> Register number 12 is ds
> Register number 13 is es
> Register number 14 is fs
> Register number 15 is gs
> Register number 16 is orig_eax
> Register number 17 is fctrl
> Register number 18 is fstat
> Register number 19 is ftag
> Register number 20 is fiseg
> Register number 21 is fioff
> Register number 22 is foseg
> Register number 23 is fooff
> Register number 24 is fop
> Register number 25 is f0
> Register number 26 is f1
> Register number 27 is f2
> Register number 28 is f3
> Register number 29 is f4
> Register number 30 is f5
> Register number 31 is f6
> Register number 32 is f7
> Register number 33 is xmm0
> Register number 34 is xmm1
> Register number 35 is xmm2
> Register number 36 is xmm3
> Register number 37 is xmm4
> Register number 38 is xmm5
> Register number 39 is xmm6
> Register number 40 is xmm7
> Register number 41 is mxcsr
> Register number 42 is vfp
>
> Note that these don't exactly reflect any of
> the structs the system returns to PTRACE calls
> or the like. And they may be IDB-internal rather
> than the actual BREG mapping. I'll try to
> chase that down and post another reply.
>
> -John
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dwarf-discuss mailing list
> Dwarf-discuss at lists.freestandards.org
> http://lists.freestandards.org/mailman/listinfo/dwarf-discuss
--
Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana.radhakrishnan at codito.com>
Codito Technologies Pvt. Ltd.
More information about the Dwarf-discuss
mailing list