Tue Feb 3 18:22:56 GMT 2009
[to reply to my own e-mail]
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 10:13 AM, Andrew Cagney <andrew.cagney at gmail.com> wrote:
> From the draft:
>> In the case of the name of a function member or static data member of a C++ structure, class or union, the name presented in the .debug_pubnames section is not the simple name given by the DW_AT_name attribute of the referenced debugging entry, but rather the fully qualified name of the data or function member.
> Just to check on a few things:
> - for C++, the fully qualified name should include any name space prefix
Should the DWARF spec be clarified by adding:
... but rather the fully qualified name /(which includes the
namespace)/ of the data or function member.
More information about the Dwarf-discuss