[Dwarf-Discuss] DW_TAG_base_type must have DW_AT_name?
Todd Allen
todd.allen@ccur.com
Wed Oct 27 16:00:13 GMT 2010
FWIW, our Ada compiler generates a few DW_TAG_base_type entries with no
DW_AT_name. Although it does look like we did give them DW_AT_description
attributes instead.
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:39:24AM -0400, Kendrick Wong wrote:
> In section 5.1, does the specification mean that DW_TAG_base_type must
> have a DW_AT_name or it can have a DW_AT_name?
> The name attribute makes sense for language like C/C++, but I'm not sure
> how it applies to language like COBOL, where the type name is implied in
> the picture string:
> i.e.
> MYEDIT PIC ABBA(5)
> this generates a variable MYEDIT, which points to a base type with
> DW_AT_encoding(DW_ATE_edited). The type itself really has no name.
> FYI.. here is the wordings In section 5.1:
> "A base type is represented by a debugging information entry with the tag
> DW_TAG_base_type.
> A base type entry has a DW_AT_name attribute whose value is a
> null-terminated string containing the name of the base type as recognized
> by the programming language of the compilation unit containing the base
> type entry.
> ...
> A base type entry may have a DW_AT_endianity attribute as described in
> Section 4.1. If omitted, the encoding assumes the representation that is
> the default for the target architecture."
>
> Kendrick Wong
> _______________________________________________
> Dwarf-Discuss mailing list
> Dwarf-Discuss at lists.dwarfstd.org
> http://lists.dwarfstd.org/listinfo.cgi/dwarf-discuss-dwarfstd.org
--
Todd Allen
Concurrent Computer Corporation
More information about the Dwarf-discuss
mailing list