Wed Sep 25 15:47:13 GMT 2013
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 3:38 AM, Mark Wielaard <mjw at redhat.com> wrote:
> I saw the following issue which proposed DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_03 and
> DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_11. It appears to have been accepted for DWARF4
> according to this page:
> But apparently didn't make it into the actual DWARF4 spec.
> Now I notice DWARF4 came out in 2010, so at least DW_LANG_C_plus_plus_11
> would be speculative. Was it misfiled and is this a proposal for DWARF5
It's marked as accepted as of 11/27/12 so ...
> Asking because I was wondering if it would make sense to propose
> DW_LANG_C11 (ISO/IEC 9899:2011) for DWARF5?
I guess? Were there any language specific changes that would be
important for consumers of debug info?
> Dwarf-Discuss mailing list
> Dwarf-Discuss at lists.dwarfstd.org
More information about the Dwarf-discuss