[Dwarf-Discuss] compilers generating ABI non-compliant function calls?

[Andreas Arnez]

On Tue, Mar 09 2021, Frank Ch. Eigler via Dwarf-Discuss wrote:

[...]

> FWIW, gcc does not leave ABI-dependent gaps in the DWARF generated for
> function parameters.  First class location lists are given, whether or
> not they are in the ABI-governed locations, or whether they've been
> moved somewhere else, or whether they've been optimized out so that a
> consumer must recompute it somehow, or whether they exist at all.

Except for varying parameters, in which case
DW_TAG_unspecified_parameters gets emitted instead, right?

--
Andreas