[Dwarf-discuss] Proposal: Error: Duplicate DW_AT_LNAME 1d

[Ron Brender]

Cary,

Actually, it would help my process if you would announce at each meeting
what language names and their corresponding issue numbers were processed in
the prior period. The point is to get that information into the Minutes. No
discussion needed, just an announcement. Actually if that information is
presented in the Agenda for a meeting that would probably suffice, although
it is the minutes that should be complete and definitive.

Thanks,
Ron


On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 12:30 PM Cary Coutant <ccoutant@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>> It appears that DW_LNAME_HIP, proposed in 230120.4,  never got
>> incorporated into the DWARF working document (so there is no duplication).
>> Perhaps because the Issue status is "Code Assigned" rather than Approved.
>> That status really only applies to the V5 code assignment actually.
>>
>
> I've been following Michael's protocol of using the status "Language Code
> Assigned" for new language codes, where no committee discussion is
> necessary. Would it help your process if I added the word "Accepted" to the
> issue status?
>
> -cary
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.dwarfstd.org/pipermail/dwarf-discuss/attachments/20240424/327a1280/attachment-0001.htm>