[Dwarf-discuss] Proposal: Error: Duplicate DW_AT_LNAME 1d

[Cary Coutant]

>
>
> >DW_LANG_HIP/DW_LNAME_HIP was assigned first, but for some reason, the
> list was out of order, so when I assigned >DW_LNAME_Assembly, it looked
> like 0x001c was the last code assigned. I think it would be safer to
> reassign >DW_LNAME_Assembly as 0x0029.
>
> I think it would be safer to just leave well-enough alone. I just updated
> the document to match the website (and make DW_LNAME_HIP = 0x0029). So any
> change causes work for me. Similarly it creates work for anyone who is
> actually trying to use code DW_LNAME_Assembly. Why bother?
>

Looks like DW_LNAME_HIP never made it into the document after it was
approved. Given the timing, it would make a little more sense to renumber
Assembly instead, but since that's already in the document, and HIP isn't,
I'll renumber HIP. Since this affects the DWARF 6 language codes only, we
shouldn't have to worry about affecting anyone. Heads up, though: if anyone
has started using DW_LNAME_HIP, please be aware of this change!

I've added this as Issue 240423.1
<https://dwarfstd.org/issues/240423.1.html>.

-cary
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.dwarfstd.org/pipermail/dwarf-discuss/attachments/20240426/1b9a42da/attachment.htm>